Do you feel that negative visual images associated with messages (i.e. messages in movies) are similar to negative visual images in the press (i.e. tabloid photos) in regard to the publicity they generate?
In other words, do you believe that all images--regardless of whether or not they are perceived as being good/accurate/bad/false--are advantageous because like the buzz generated around Hollywood's new "A-List," it is facilitative of discourse and discourse in regard to George's article is the basis of change.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment